Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 2045 days newer than Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 4% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 164 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 58 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 12 vs 8 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for £89.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74211 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1180
53.033707865168545%
Multi-Core
5480
73.48799785436503%
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |