Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1671 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 20% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than EPYC 7551P - 195 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 58 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 64 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
195
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.42/FPS
100%
Price, £
£81.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £81.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | EPYC |
Alder Lake | Codename | Naples |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 32 |
8 | Threads | 64 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |