Buy on Amazon
£69.8
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1356 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 28% better in The Callisto Protocol than EPYC 7551P - 118 vs 92 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 65 vs 180 Watts
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
118
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.59/FPS
100%
Price, £
£69.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-10105F 10th Generation - Desktop processor (3.7 GHz Tuboboost: 4.4 GHz, 4 cores, LGA1200) BX8070110105F
Buy for £69.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12939 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
| Naples | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
