Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100 is 3172 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100
- Performs up to 27% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-6350 - 193 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 60 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i3-12100 - £49.99 vs £95.0
- Up to 33% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-12100 - £0.33 vs £0.49 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |