Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100 outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100 is 3172 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100
- Performs up to 13% better in Valheim than FX-4350 - 214 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 60 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i3-12100 - £59.97 vs £95.0
- Up to 27% better value when playing Valheim than Core i3-12100 - £0.32 vs £0.44 per FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for £95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100 | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |