Key Differences
In short — Core i3-1115G4 outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-1115G4 is 2467 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-1115G4
- Performs up to 29% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G1820 - 578 vs 448 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-1115G4 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 53 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |