Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 320 days older than Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for £75.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 250 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
1454
94.47693307342429%
Multi-Core
4472
96.67099005620406%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |