Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Core i3-10105T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 798 days older than Core i3-10105T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Core i3-10105T - 151 vs 150 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
151
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.65/FPS
100%
Price, £
£98.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £98.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12672 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105T | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |