Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 320 days older than Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 2% better in World of Warcraft than Core i3-10105F - 187 vs 184 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for £75.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 269 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
1454
94.47693307342429%
Multi-Core
4472
96.67099005620406%
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |