Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 2662 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 31% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G1820 - 185 vs 141 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - £5.99 vs £79.99
- Up to 91% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i3-10105 - £0.04 vs £0.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
185
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.43/FPS
9.30232558139535%
Price, £
£79.99
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for £79.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 554 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
141
76.21621621621621%
Value, £/FPS
£0.04/FPS
100%
Price, £
£5.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £5.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 554 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
33.01950235373235%
Multi-Core
825
17.899761336515514%
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |