Key Differences
In short — FX-6200 outperforms Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6200 is 95 days older than Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G550 - 154 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 6 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Celeron G550
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 3 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
