Key Differences
In short — FX-6200 outperforms Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6200 is 176 days newer than Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G530 - 150 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 6 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G530
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G530 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 3 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
