Buy on Amazon
£175
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $109
Availability
MSRP in USD: $109
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1200 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 1200 is 205 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1200 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Performs up to 16% better in War Thunder than Celeron G3930T - 156 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Ryzen 3 1200
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
156
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.12/FPS
100%
Price, £
£175
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler - YD1200BBAEBOX, Black
Buy for £175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 3 1200
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
