Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 2186 days newer than Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 1% better in Deathloop than Core i5-2400S - 169 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400S - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
169
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.18/FPS
100%
Price, £
£29.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £29.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |