Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1696 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 51 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Up to 42% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - £74.99 vs £128.82
- Up to 43% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Celeron G3900 - £0.33 vs £0.58 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
224
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.58/FPS
56.896551724137936%
Price, £
£128.82
58%
Buy for £128.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4173 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
224
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.33/FPS
100%
Price, £
£74.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £74.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |