Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 732 days older than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 53 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G1840 - 169 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 8 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
166
98%
Value, £/FPS
£0.3/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10605 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 77 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |