Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700T outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7700T is 1129 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Performs up to 10% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G1820 - 128 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 35 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Core i7-7700T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i7-7700T |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 53 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
