Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2342 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 97% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - £5.99 vs £218.66
- Up to 97% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i7-10700F - £0.01 vs £0.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 20% better in Minecraft than Celeron G1820 - 729 vs 605 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 16 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
605
82.99039780521262%
Value, £/FPS
£0.01/FPS
100%
Price, £
£5.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £5.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
729
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.3/FPS
3.3333333333333335%
Price, £
£218.66
2%
FPS Winner
Buy for £218.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
30.4590570719603%
Multi-Core
825
11.409210344350711%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |