Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150 outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4150 is 151 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Core i3-4150 - 53 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 41% better in FIFA 23 than Celeron G1820 - 135 vs 96 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Core i3-4150
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
