Buy on Amazon
£141
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9590 is 190 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 55 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 8% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G1620 - 247 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
247
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.57/FPS
100%
Price, £
£141
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD FX-9590 Vishera 8-Core 4.7 GHz Socket AM3+ 220W FD9590FHHKWOF Desktop Processor - Black
Buy for £141 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2595 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
75.18382352941177%
Multi-Core
723
33.302625518194375%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 220 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
