Buy on Amazon
£59.97
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — FX-4350 outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4350 is 147 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Performs up to 4% better in Rust than Celeron G1610T - 155 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 4 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
155
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.39/FPS
100%
Price, £
£59.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD FX-4350 4-Core Processor (125W, AM3+, 12MB Cache, 4300MHz)
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
