Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3330 outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3330 is 91 days older than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Core i5-3330 - 35 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Performs up to 2% better in God of War than Celeron G1610T - 164 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 4 vs 2 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
164
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.37/FPS
100%
Price, £
£59.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 77 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |