Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms Pentium G640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 183 days newer than Pentium G640.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Pentium G640 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Pentium G640
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Pentium G640 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 3rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
