Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1157 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-6100 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron B820 - 158 vs 140 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron B820
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Core i3-6100
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
