Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3474 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 22% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron B820 - 242 vs 198 FPS
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
242
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.21/FPS
100%
Price, £
£50
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 215 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |