Key Differences
In short — Core i7-860 outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-860 is 649 days older than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 17 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Performs up to 1% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Celeron 847 - 296 vs 293 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 8 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Core i7-860
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
