Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 3238 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 17 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 11% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron 847 - 161 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 12 vs 2 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
161
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.99/FPS
100%
Price, £
£158.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £158.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |