Key Differences
In short — FX-4350 outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4350 is 680 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 17 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Performs up to 4% better in Valorant than Celeron 847 - 685 vs 661 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 4 vs 2 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
