Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 2501 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 89% better in War Thunder than Celeron 3205U - 230 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 12 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
230
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.49/FPS
100%
Price, £
£113
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £113 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |