Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 1887 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i3-10300 - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 8% better in World of Tanks than Celeron 3205U - 539 vs 499 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 8 vs 2 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
539
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.32/FPS
100%
Price, £
£170.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £170.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |