Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2207 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 15 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 16% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron 3205U - 313 vs 270 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 12 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
313
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.54/FPS
100%
Price, £
£169.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £169.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18038 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |