Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 1145 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Celeron 3205U - 201 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 12 vs 2 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Ryzen 5 2600
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
