Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 1881 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 68% better in F1 23 than Celeron 3205U - 225 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 8 vs 2 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Ryzen 3 3100
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
