Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Celeron 2955U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3412 days newer than Celeron 2955U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 2955U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 42% better in Battlefield V than Celeron 2955U - 285 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 2955U - 32 vs 2 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
285
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.85/FPS
100%
Price, £
£526.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £526.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 2955U | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |