Key Differences
In short — Celeron 1000M outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron 1000M is 596 days older than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 20 vs 2 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |