Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1444 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-7100 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 31% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron 1000M - 174 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 4 vs 2 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
174
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.34/FPS
100%
Price, £
£58.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £58.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |