Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3250 outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3250 is 140 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3250 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Performs up to 4% better in Far Cry 5 than Celeron 1000M - 186 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 4 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 1000M
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Core i3-3250
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
