Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7700 outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7700 is 3646 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7700
- Performs up to 54% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron 1000M - 134 vs 87 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 16 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
134
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.09/FPS
100%
Price, £
£280.07
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £280.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14083 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |