The FX-8150 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-13900KS and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only £409.46 cheaper!
Advantages of the FX-8150
- Up to 81% cheaper – £98.22 vs £507.68
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 125 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of the Core i9-13900KS
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 8 threads
FX-8150 vs Core i9-13900KS for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-13900KS
Jan 12th, 2023
Average FPS
224
100%
Min 1% FPS
147
100%
Price, £
£507.68
19%
Value, £/FPS
£2.26/FPS
26%
FX-8150 vs Core i9-13900KS in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8150 vs Core i9-13900KS in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8150 vs Core i9-13900KS in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900KS
Jan 12th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8150 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $699.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
125 W | Power Consumption | 150 W |
| Performance | ||
| 8 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 6.0 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
