Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the more expensive Core i9-14900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 361 days older than the more expensive Core i9-14900F.
Advantages of Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-14900F - 225 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - £491.10 vs £499.98
- Up to 3% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-14900F - £2.18 vs £2.24 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
225
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.18/FPS
100%
Price, £
£491.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £491.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349 minutes ago
Buy for £499.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900KS | vs | Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
150 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |