In Battlefield 6, the FX-8150 is much slower than the Core i9-13900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $498 cheaper!
FX-8150
- Up to 91% cheaper – $51.29 vs $548.89
- Up to 91% cheaper
- Up to 80% better value in Battlefield 6 – $0.84 vs $4.12/FPS
- Up to 80% better value in Battlefield 6
Core i9-13900K
- Up to 118% faster in Battlefield 6 – 133 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 118% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 10 years and 11 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 10 years and 11 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
FX-8150 vs Core i9-13900K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
61 FPS
46%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
46%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
133 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
100 FPS
100%
Price, $
$548.89
9%
Value, $/FPS
$4.12/FPS
20%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8150 vs Core i9-13900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8150 vs Core i9-13900K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8150 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
