The FX-8150 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-13900K and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only £444.17 cheaper!
Advantages of the FX-8150
- Up to 82% cheaper – £98.22 vs £542.39
Advantages of the Core i9-13900K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 8 threads
FX-8150 vs Core i9-13900K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
221
100%
Min 1% FPS
145
100%
Price, £
£542.39
18%
Value, £/FPS
£2.45/FPS
24%
FX-8150 vs Core i9-13900K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8150 vs Core i9-13900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8150 vs Core i9-13900K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8150 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-13900K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 8 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.8 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
