In The Last of Us Part I, the FX-8150 is faster than the Core i9-13900K and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $498 cheaper!
FX-8150
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 244 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Up to 91% cheaper – $51.29 vs $548.89
- Up to 91% cheaper
- Up to 92% better value in The Last of Us Part I – $0.21 vs $2.57/FPS
- Up to 92% better value in The Last of Us Part I
Core i9-13900K
- Is 10 years and 11 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 10 years and 11 months newer
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
FX-8150 vs Core i9-13900K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
244 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
213 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
159 FPS
87%
Price, $
$548.89
9%
Value, $/FPS
$2.57/FPS
8%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8150 vs Core i9-13900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8150 vs Core i9-13900K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8150 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
