Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 3906 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of FX-6350
- Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X3D - £39.99 vs £239.56
- Up to 74% better value when playing Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than Ryzen 7 5700X3D - £0.45 vs £1.74 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 55% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than FX-6350 - 138 vs 89 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 16 vs 6 threads
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 772 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
138
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.74/FPS
26%
Price, £
£239.56
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for £239.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 771 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6350 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Not Available |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |