Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5500 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5500 is 3262 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of FX-6350
- Up to 52% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5500 - £39.99 vs £84.00
- Up to 43% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 5 5500 - £0.13 vs £0.23 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5500
- Performs up to 15% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-6350 - 366 vs 319 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
Buy for £84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6350 | vs | Ryzen 5 5500 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |