The FX-6300 is a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Celeron G1820. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G1820
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 44% less energy – 53 vs 95 Watts
FX-6300 vs Celeron G1820 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Celeron G1820
Dec 1st, 2013
Average FPS
168
100%
Min 1% FPS
113
100%
Price, £
£5.99
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.03/FPS
100%
FX-6300 vs Celeron G1820 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6300 vs Celeron G1820 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6300 vs Celeron G1820 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Celeron G1820
Dec 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-6300 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G1820 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
| $132.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
| Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 53 W |
| Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 3 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
