Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 2531 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Celeron G1820
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5900X - £5.99 vs £204.99
- Up to 95% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 9 5900X - £0.14 vs £2.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 53 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 61% better in Starfield than Celeron G1820 - 71 vs 44 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 24 vs 2 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £5.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6961 minutes ago
Buy for £204.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6961 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1820 | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |