Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700 outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700 is 3689 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700
- Performs up to 21% better in Battlefield IV than FX-6200 - 444 vs 368 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 16 vs 6 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
444
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.28/FPS
100%
Price, £
£126.47
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £126.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 874 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6200 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Not Available |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |