Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3620 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-6200 - 218 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 58 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
218
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.32/FPS
100%
Price, £
£70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6200 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |