Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2687 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-6200 - 192 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 16 vs 6 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Ryzen 7 3700X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6200 | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Matisse |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 3 | Cores | 8 |
| 6 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
