The FX-4300 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Celeron G6900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-4300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G6900
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
FX-4300 vs Celeron G6900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Please refine your search results or...
Shoot us an email and we'll quickly add this!
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, £
£60.49
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.31/FPS
100%
FX-4300 vs Celeron G6900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4300 vs Celeron G6900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4300 vs Celeron G6900 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-4300 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| $122.00 | MSRP | $52.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | Not Available |
| Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
